DICOM router and mini PACS
One application on one PC in your centre. It receives from every scanner, keeps the studies, sends the worklist back to the consoles so nobody retypes a patient, prints film, and delivers each study wherever your rules say. It is sold on its own and needs nothing else from us.
What it replaces
A scanner with nothing in front of it produces images and a problem. The radiographer types the patient’s name at the console, so it is spelled a little differently from the one at the front desk. The study stays on the machine until somebody burns it. The centre finds out a scan happened when the patient asks where the report is.
The router ends all of that at once. The scheduled patient arrives on the console by itself. The images arrive in storage by themselves. And where each study goes afterwards is a rule you write, not a decision somebody has to remember to make.
One bridge, many destinations. What changes between centres is the rules, not the software.
Three products, one binary
Point every scanner at it and keep your studies there. It receives, indexes, finds, retrieves, prints film, and answers the storage commitment a modality asks for before it erases its own copy.
Rules in priority order decide where each study goes: your own storage, a system you already own, a remote reading service, or a web endpoint. A study can go to more than one place.
It serves the scheduled patient to the scanner's own console, so the radiographer picks the name from a list instead of typing it. Wrong names are the largest single cause of studies nobody can bill.
What you get on day one
It also drains what it is sending before it shuts down, rather than dropping studies on the way out.
Where it belongs
Most vendors would describe this product as secure and move on. The honest position is that it is built to sit inside a trusted network, and it should be deployed that way.
Traffic between the scanners and the router is not encrypted. The listener accepts a connection from any machine that speaks to it, which is deliberate, because refusing unknown equipment is the most common reason a router fails to work with a scanner nobody documented. The viewer it serves has no login.
None of that is a problem on a hospital network you control, which is where it is designed to live and where we install it. It would be a problem on a public address, so we do not put it there, and we help you set up remote access properly instead.
Straight answers